Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9135 (BOM)

SHARVARI MANOJ SUDEWAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

WP/2088/2025 · 2025-02-12

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

918 WP 2088 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 WRIT PETITION NO. 2088 OF 2025 SHARVARI MANOJ SUDEWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mahadevappa Vibhute AGP for Respondents: Mr. V.M. Kagne ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 12.02.2025 PER COURT : Heard. 2. The petitioner possesses a certificate of validity with a superimposed rubber stamp mentioning “conditional validity”. 3. When Rule 12(7) and 12(9) of the Rules of 1983 framed under the Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001, prescribed a specific Form G for issuance of a certificate of validity, no such condition could have been superimposed with rubber stamp. 4. The learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that the committee would immediately issue a fresh certificate of validity in correct form, once the petitioner surrenders the earlier one. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the committee, surrender the original certificate and have a fresh one in the corrected form. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:4043-DB