Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52792 RFA No. 409 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 409 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
M/S RANI ENTERPRISES, REP. BY ITS PARTNER MRS. RANI, W/O. KANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.15, SUCHITRA APARTMENTS, III MAIN, WARD NO.75, KURUBARAHALLI, BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. C.NARASIMHA MURTHY, ADV. (ABSENT)) AND:
MR. R.NANDAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH NAIDU, R/AT NO.1527, 11TH CROSS, 13TH MAIN ROAD, B.T.M, 2ND STAGE, KUVEMPU NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 076. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.S.NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.1.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.419/2013 ON THE FILE OF XIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52792 RFA No. 409 of 2014
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
A perusal of the order sheet would indicate that the appellant is consistently absent and today also no representation has been made on behalf of the appellant.
2. Sri. B.S.Nagaraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the appellant is regularly absent. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending I.As, if any, do not survive for consideration.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9