Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91339 (ALL)

SHYAM NARAYAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/30829/2025 · 2025-09-03

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30829 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the Case no. 538 (Sri Kailash Yadav Versus Ramsakhi) under section 33/34 U.P. Revenue Code 2006, which is pending before him within the stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court so that justice may be done." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under Section 33/34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no. 2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case no. 538 (Sri Kailash Yadav Versus Ramsakhi), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 4, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bachcha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Shyam Narayan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad