IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 145 Ram Singh State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. granted notional increment and thereafter, re benefits in terms of the Notification dated 10.07.2024, regarding which representation dated 25.07.2024, Annexure P dated 01.10.2024 and 08.04.2025, yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2. made. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Deepak Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not been granted notional increment and thereafter, re benefits in terms of the Notification dated 10.07.2024, regarding which representation dated 25.07.2024, Annexure P dated 01.10.2024 and 08.04.2025, has been submitted, but the same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23829-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.08.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not been granted notional increment and thereafter, re-fixation of pensionary benefits in terms of the Notification dated 10.07.2024, regarding which a representation dated 25.07.2024, Annexure P-3, followed with reminders has been submitted, but the same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound el has no objection to the limited prayer In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.20 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-23829-2025 -2- the respondents to decide the representation dated 25.07.2024, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 19.08.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.20 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.