- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43718 WP No. 19921 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 19921 OF 2024 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: 1. SMT JOYTHI W/O SRI SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT YAREBORE KAVALU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESH H T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANASOUDHA, BANGALORE - 01 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN - 573 201 3. THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE HASSAN TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAHSILDAR HASSAN TALUK - 573 201 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43718 WP No. 19921 of 2024 4. THE TAHSILDAR HASSAN TALUK - 573 201 HASSAN DISTRICT. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION TO PLACE THE CLAIM OF PETITIONER IN FORM NO.57 FOR REGULARIZATION OF HIS UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF THE LAND IN SY.NO.177 MEASURING AN EXTENT OF 4 ACRE 20 GUNTAS OF LAND SITUATED AT KATTAYA KAVALU VILLAGE, AND SEERAJEBORE KAVALU, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, AND TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS IN TERMS OF RULES 108 D OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE RULES. ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. 2. It is noticed that office objection includes non- payment of Court fee. Several opportunities have been granted. This Court on 24.10.2025 has passed an order which reads as follows: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43718 WP No. 19921 of 2024 "There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. It is noticed that Court fee has not been paid and other office objections still remain to be complied with despite several opportunities having been granted. It is made clear that if office objections are not complied within one week, matter to be listed in 'orders' list for dismissal on 31.10.2025." 3. Even on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. The petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the proceedings. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP