Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91318 (PNJ)

GEETA v. ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS

RSA/2929/2018 · 2025-08-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242 Smt. Geeta Ashok Kumar and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous as the matter has amicably been respondents have handed over possession of the appellant. 2. aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the respondents the factum of compromise between the parties. 3. of, as having been rendered 4. 25.08.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Smt. Geeta Versus Ashok Kumar and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Tushar Gautam, Advocate for Mr. DS Matya, Advocate for the Mr. Amandeep Rana, Advocate for the respondent NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous as the matter has amicably been settled between the parties and the respondents have handed over possession of the Learned counsel for the appellant has not disputed the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the respondents the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, the present second appeal is as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2929-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for Mr. DS Matya, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Amandeep Rana, Advocate for the respondents. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous as, settled between the parties and the respondents have handed over possession of the suit property to the counsel for the appellant has not disputed the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the respondents and admits the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, the present second appeal is disposed Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No counsel for the respondents , settled between the parties and the property to the counsel for the appellant has not disputed the and admits disposed RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.