CRM-M-47783 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Charanjot Singh alias Jot State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. has filed this dated 30.07.2023 120-B, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 29, 30 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Stat 2. that the petitioner was one of the assailants, however, it is submitted that he has assaulted on the non vital part of the body i.e. right arm, whereas the death is injury. 3. to be examined, this Court 47783-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : Charanjot Singh alias Jot Versus Punjab HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Gursimran Singh Madaan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Senior DAG **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) The petitioner, who is in custody since has filed this petition for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 30.07.2023, under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, B, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 29, 30 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station, Adampur, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner was one of the assailants, however, it is submitted that he has assaulted on the non vital part of the body i.e. right arm, whereas the death is Considering the fact that some eye witnesses are yet to be examined, this Court, for the time being IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-47783-2024 Date of decision : 22.08.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE , Advocate, for Mr. Gursimran Singh Madaan, Advocate, Senior DAG, Punjab. ( Oral ) The petitioner, who is in custody since 07.08.2023 petition for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 104 s 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, B, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 29, 30 of Arms Act, 1959, ion, Adampur, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner was one of the assailants, however, it is submitted that he has assaulted on the non vital part of the body i.e. right arm, whereas the death is attributed to gun-shot Considering the fact that some eye witnesses are yet for the time being, declines bail with -1- 2024 08.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 07.08.2023 104 s 302, 307, 323, 324, 326, B, 34 IPC and Sections 25, 29, 30 of Arms Act, 1959, Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner was one of the assailants, however, it is submitted that he has assaulted on the non vital part of the shot Considering the fact that some eye witnesses are yet bail with AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.26 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-47783-2024 -2- liberty to the petitioner to come again after the examination of all the eye witnesses. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands dismissed. ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE August 22, 2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.26 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document