Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.125 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2024 Thana- SHAMPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Suman @ Rahul Kahar S/O Anil Ram Resident Of Village- Bahadurpur P.S.- Bariyarpur District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Sah, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-01-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Shampur P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 354, 427, 448 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The prosecution alleges that on account of some trifle, all the FIR named accused persons, including the petitioner armed with lathi, danda and other weapons came there and started abusing and assaulting. It is specifically alleged that the petitioner along with other named and unknown persons brutally assaulted the informant and when the father, brother and wife came to his rescue, the accused persons also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.125 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 2/3 assaulted them. There is allegation of theft and loot of valuables from the grocery shop of the informant and his brother. 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner referring to the FIR contended that there is omnibus nature of allegation against all the FIR named accused persons. So far the injury sustained to the informant and others are concerned, the same appears to be simple in nature. In support of the aforesaid contention, the injury report of the injured persons have been placed on record as Annexure-2 series. Referring to the aforesaid facts, two co- accused persons, having identical allegation, have been accorded the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 81208 of 2024 vide order dated 04.12.2024, the copy of which is marked as Annexure-P/3. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that the petitioner and others have brutally assaulted the informant and his family members, apart from that, there is allegation of looting of valuables. 6.
Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the omnibus nature of allegation, coupled with the simple injury and the fair antecedent; moreover, persons having identical allegation have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.125 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 3/3 been allowed the privilege of anticipatory bail, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Shampur P.S. Case No. 63 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. shivank/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T