IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CRM-M-44441-2025 Date of Decision : 18.08.2025 SUMIT …. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA …. RESPONDENT CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present :- Mr.J.P.Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in criminal case bearing FIR No.55 dated 26.02.2025 registered under Section 109 (1) of BNS, 2023 (Section 3(5), 61(2), 351(3), 238 of BNS added later on) and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 was replaced with Section 25 (1-B) A Arms Act, 1959 later on at Police Station Badli, District Jhajjar. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The entire prosecution story is concocted one. No recovery is to be effected from him. The co- accused has been granted benefit of regular bail. There are no chances of absconding or tampering with the prosecution witnesses, if the petitioner is granted the benefit of bail. 3. Heard. 4. Considering the manner in which the offence has been committed and the specific role attributed to the present petitioner that he Anju Goel 2025.08.21 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-44441-2025 -2- accompanied the co-accused, went to the house of the complainant and then, co-accused fired the gunshot. This Court is not inclined to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 18.08. 2025 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.08.21 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh