- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45159 RSA No. 927 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 927 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN: SIDDALINGAIAH S., S/O LATE SAMPIGAIAH @ SAMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O YELECHIKKAINA PALYA, DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572225. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. R.SHIVAGANGAPPA DEAD BY LRS SHIVAMMA W/O. LATE H.SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, HALESAMPIGE, SAMPIGE POST, DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK - 572225. 2. BASAVARAJU S/O. LATE H.SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. RENUKAPRASAD S/O. LATE H.SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45159 RSA No. 927 of 2020 RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF HALESAMPIGE, SAMPIGE POST, DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK -572225. 4. SUNANDAMMA W/O. VIRUPAKSHAIAH, D/O. LATE H.SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SAMPIGE HOSAHALLI, DONDINASHIVARA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK - 572225.. 5. SHYALAMMA W/O. RANGASWAMAIAH, D/O. LATE SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HINDISKERE KIBBANAHALLI HOBLI, TIPLUR TALUK -572114. 6. RATHNAMMA W/O. CHANDRAIAH, D/O. LATE SHIVAGANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT HARANAHALLI, NITTUR POST, NILLUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK - 572223. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45159 RSA No. 927 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 13.04.2022 and 08.07.2022. On those days, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is listed today. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2020. Now we are in November 2025. The appeal is pending from five years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE TKN,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19