Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91277 (KAR)

HARISH @ HANDI HARISH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.A/1186/2025 · 2025-07-21

M G Uma

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27255 CRL.A No. 1186 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1186 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2)) BETWEEN: HARISH @ HANDI HARISH S/O LATE. TAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.60, BAHADDURUPUR, 23RD WARD, ANEKAL TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562106. (WRONGLY TYPED AS BAHADDURUPU IN CHARGE SHEET) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH M.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANEKAL P.S., BENGALURU REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.22, BAHADDURPUR, ANEKAL TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1 R2 - SD) THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27255 CRL.A No. 1186 of 2025 HONBLE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN SPL.C.NO.807/2024 ON 31.01.2025 AND B. ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.250/2024 REGISTERED BY ANEKAL POLICE STATION BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 189(2), 103(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 61(2)(A) AND 324(4) OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.3(2)(V-A) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. THIS CRL.A., COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant after addressing arguments for sometime, seeks permission of this Court not to press the appeal with liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after examination of material witnesses. Submission is placed on record. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail after examination of material witnesses. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34