HARISH @ HANDI HARISH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
CRL.A/1186/2025 · 2025-07-21
M G Uma
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91277 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91277 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27255 CRL.A No. 1186 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1186 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2)) BETWEEN:
HARISH @ HANDI HARISH S/O LATE. TAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.60, BAHADDURUPUR, 23RD WARD, ANEKAL TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562106.
(WRONGLY TYPED AS BAHADDURUPU IN CHARGE SHEET) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH M.R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANEKAL P.S., BENGALURU REP.
BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001
2. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT WARD NO.22, BAHADDURPUR, ANEKAL TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1 R2 - SD)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE
Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27255 CRL.A No. 1186 of 2025
HONBLE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN SPL.C.NO.807/2024 ON 31.01.2025 AND B. ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.250/2024 REGISTERED BY ANEKAL POLICE STATION BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 189(2), 103(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 61(2)(A) AND 324(4) OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.3(2)(V-A) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS CRL.A., COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant after addressing
arguments for sometime, seeks permission of this Court not to press the appeal with liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after examination of material witnesses.
Submission is placed on record.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail after examination of material witnesses. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
SPV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34