Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9127 (PAT)

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2921/2025 · 2025-01-24

R P Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2921 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66216 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2024 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Santosh Yadav @ Santosh S/o- Sobhit Lal Yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 2. Dipendra Yadav @ Dipendra Kumar S/o- Dinesh Yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 3. Satendra Kumar Yadav @ Satendra Yadav S/o- Dinesh Yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 4. Umesh Prasad Yadav @ Umesh Yadav S/o- Late Sotilal Yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 5. Dinesh Prasad Yadav @ Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar Rai S/o- Late Sotilal Yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 6. Sobhit Lal @ Sobhit Lal Yadav S/o- Jimidar yadav Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga 7. Md. Fakir Alam @ Fakir Alam S/o- Md. Fuloo Village- Kubaul Ps- Jamalpur Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Parasmani, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 24-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 01.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66216 of 2024 by which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2024, to the satisfaction of learned court below and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2921 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2 petitioner was directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of six weeks. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some unavoidable reasons i.e., unprecedented drought in his locality, the petitioner could not surrender in the Court below well within time. It is prayed on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that further two weeks’ time may be extended so that the petitioner could surrender in the Court below. 4. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds mentioned in the modification application, the period of surrender of the petitioner in the Court below is extended for a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The rest of the conditions stipulated in the order will be same. 5. The order dated dated 01.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66216 of 2024 is modified to the extent as indicated above. 6. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. Raj Kishore/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T