Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91255 (ALL)

KULDEEP PAL v. BAIJNATH AND ANOTHER

A227/10512/2025 · 2025-09-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10512 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i) issue an order or direction to the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.) Court no. 17, District Prayagraj to expeditiously decide temporary injunction application (6-C) in Original Suit no. 1431 of 2024 Kuldeep Pal vs Baijnath & Another pending since 05-10-2024 in Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Court no. 17, District Prayagraj. ii) issue an order or direction to the respondents to maintain status quo on suit property till the disposal of temporary injunction application (6-C) in Original Suit no. 1431 of 2024 Kuldeep Pal vs Baijnath & Another pending since 05-10-2024 in Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Court no. 17, District Prayagraj." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.) Court No. 17, District Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Singh, Prabhat Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kuldeep Pal .....Petitioner(s) Baijnath And Another .....Respondent(s) Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 8, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 10512 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad