Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83031 Reserved On:-13.05.2025 Delivered On:-.19.05.2025 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32168 of 2024 Applicant :- Ramveer @ Gautam Opposite Party :- State Of Up Through Secretary Home Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Kashyap,Nandini Pandey,Satya Prakash,V.P. Singh Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party :- Adya Prasad Tewari,G.A.,Ravi Shankar Tripathi Hon'ble Siddharth,J. 1. Heard Sri Satya Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ramveer @ Gautam, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 90 of 2024, under Section- 302, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station- Moosajhag, District- Budaun. 3. On 01.04.2024 at 15:42 hours information was given by one, Paras Yadav, regarding a death in the house of Jagpal, brother of Jagdish, in suspicious circumstances. Post mortem and inquest proceedings of dead body of deceased were conducted on 02.09.2024. Thereafter, F.I.R. was lodged on the same day at 03:30 p.m. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that F.I.R. is delayed by 28 hours. In the post mortem and inquest proceedings of the deceased none of his family members were present. Co-accused, Jagdish, the brother of Jagpal and the applicant have been implicated in this case being close family member of the deceased. Evidence against applicant is the recovery of a danda from open place on 06.04.2024. There is no public witness of the recovery. He has submitted that the name of the applicant has wrongly been introduced in this case. The motive of crime can be assigned to other co-accused. The applicant is brother of Jagpal and has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. Learned AGA has pointed out that the deceased suffered ten ante mortem injuries mostly in the form of contusions on different parts of his body. The incident could not have been caused by one or two persons. The deceased was brutally beaten by number of persons because of his affair with the niece of the applicant. 6. This Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant on bail at this stage. 7. The bail application is accordingly, rejected. 8. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant as expeditiously as possible, as per section 309 Cr.P.C. (new section 346 B.N.S.S.) 9. Registrar(Compliance) is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court below within ten days. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Abhishek Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad