Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9124 (MAD)

G.VELU v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/44536/2025 · 2026-07-27

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 44536 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 44536 of 2025 G.Velu S/o.Govindasamy, No.16/33,3rd Street, Gajalakshmi Colony, Shenoy Nagar,Chennai-30 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Chennai District, Pin-600 001 2. The District Revenue Officer Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62, Beach Road, George Town, Chennai-600 001 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai North, Tondiarpet, Chennai-600 001 4. The Tahsildar Gandhi Main Road, Balaji Nagar, Puzhal, Madhavaram, Chennai-600 066 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly the 4th respondent to consider his representation dated 28.8.2025 and issue patta to the petitioner in respect of the Grama Natham land comprised in survey No.11/2 measuring an extend of 1720 sq.ft situated at Kodungaiyur, chennai with a time limit https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44536 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Elumalai For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 28.08.2025 before the respondents, requesting them for issuance of gramanatham patta, in respect of the subject property, in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 3. In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. 5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 4th respondent to consider the representation of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44536 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 the petitioner dated 28.08.2025 and after issuing notice and affording opportunity of personal hearing to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 27-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To 1. The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Chennai District, Pin-600 001 2. The District Revenue Officer Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor, 62, Beach Road, George Town, Chennai-600 001 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai North, Tondiarpet, Chennai-600 001 4. The Tahsildar Gandhi Main Road, Balaji Nagar, Puzhal, Madhavaram, Chennai-600 066 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 44536 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 44536 of 2025 27-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis