IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2024 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1. Premshila Devi S/o Sikindra Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 2. Poonam Devi W/o Satrudhan Raut @ Satrughan Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 3. Raushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar S/o Sikindra Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 4. Sikindra Raut @ Sikindar Raut S/o Sita Sharan Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 5. Sita Sharan Raut S/o Late Ramphal Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 6. Krishna Kumar S/o Sikindra Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 7. Bala Lakhindra Raut @ Lakhindra Raut @ Lakhindar Raut S/o Sita Sharan Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 8. Manoj Raut @ Manoj Kumar S/o Nand Kishore Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 9. Nand Kishore Raut S/o Late Parmeshwar Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi 10. Rohan Raut @ Shatrohan Raut S/o Sita Sharan Raut R/o village - Sirsi, P.S. - Nanpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madan Kumar, A.P.P. Mr. Saurabh Anand, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 03-03-2025 Petition for pre-arrest bail of petitioners no.4, 7 and 9 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 10.1.2025. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners no. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10, the State and the informant. 3. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29 of 2025(3) dt.03-03-2025 2/2 118(1), 109, 74, 351(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of the occurrence, while the informant was sitting at his door, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners came there and assaulted the informant and others causing them several injuries. 5. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that on account of land dispute between the parties, free fight took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Injuries caused by these petitioners were simple. 6. Learned counsel for the State as well as the informant oppose the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of petitioners no. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let petitioners no. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in Nanpur Police Station Case No. 383 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T