Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91209 (KAR)

SMT PUSHPAMMA v. THE GRAIN MERCHANTS

WP/31514/2017 · 2025-10-15

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40776 WP No. 31514 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.31514 OF 2017 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUSHPAMMA W/O RAVI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 2. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O SANJEEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. SMT. MOHANAAMBA D/O SANJEEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 4. DURGAPRASAD S/O MOHANAAMBA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, 5. SANJEEVA S/O MOHANAAMBA, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.33/2, AND 33/3, BILEKAHALLI VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H R ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40776 WP No. 31514 of 2017 AND: 1. THE GRAIN MERCHANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, NO.2, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560018 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. SRI. HEMACHANDRA REDDY S/O CHALUVAIAH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.478, 3RD 'C' MAIN, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K S SREEKANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.6.2017 IN TSA NO.147/2017 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40776 WP No. 31514 of 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are assailing the Order dated 19.06.2017 in TSA No.147/2017 (Annexure-K), passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal - II, Karnataka at Bangalore. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, submitted that the petitioners are having efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the order impugned in this Writ Petition. 4. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail such remedy as provided under law, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1