HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30447 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents 2. The petitioner by means of the present petition has assailed the notice/order dated 12.02.2021 passed by the respondent no.3 as well as order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the respondent no.2. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that against the order impugned, there is a statutory remedy of revision under Rule 80 U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021. 4. The aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Since, there is statutory remedy of filing revision under Rule 80 U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021 against the order impugned, therefore, present petition is not maintainable before this Court. 6. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. 7. If petitioner prefers any revision against the impugned order within a period of one month from today, the Revisional Authority shall decide the same on merit without entering into the question of limitation. September 11, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Arun Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad