RAMPRASAD ALIAS RAMU SADANAND GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/33742/2025 · 2025-09-03
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91205 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91205 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33742 of 2025 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B. P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1.
2. The present application under section 528 BNSS has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet No.1051 of 2020 dated 01.11.2020 and cognizance/summoning order dated 12.03.2021, passed by learned In-charge Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Gorakhpur, as well as the entire proceeding of Case No.29546 of 2021 (State Vs. Rajdev & others), arising out of Case Crime No.677 of 2020, under sections 147, 308, 323, 504, 506, IPC, Police Station Gulriha, District Gorakhpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate(Senior Division)/Fast Track Court, Gorakhpur.
3. After some arguments learned counsel for the applicant is confining his prayer for issuance of a direction to the court concerned to consider the bail application of the applicant, as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State has not opposed the prayer so made by learned counsel for the applicant.
5. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if the applicant surrenders/appears before the learned trial court within four Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramprasad Alias Ramu Sadanand Gupta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
weeks from today and applies for bail, then his bail application, shall be heard and decide by the trial court concerned, expeditiously in accordance with the judgement and order of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks or till the applicant surrenders/appears before the learned trial court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the present application is hereby disposed of. September 4, 2025 VKG NA528 No. 33742 of 2025 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad