Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9119 (UTT)

JITENDRA v. MAYUR DIXIT

CLCON/325/2025 · 2025-08-21

Ravindra Maithani

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 08 CLCON No.325 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, Advocate for the respondents. Heard. The petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court that the order dated 19.09.2018, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WPPIL No.82 of 2017, Jitendra Vs. District Magistrate (“the first petition”), has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents. On 17.07.2025, the Court had required learned State Counsel to get instructions in the matter. Today, at the very outset, learned State Counsel submits that the order dated 19.09.2018, passed in the first petition, has already been complied with. There is no encroachment. He has tendered the written instructions received by him for the perusal of the Court. Let it be taken on record. In view of the statement given by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in this contempt petition. It stands disposed of, accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 21.08.2025 RV