Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91179 (MAD)

P.S.Karthikeyan v. The District Collector

WP Crl./686/2025 · 2025-08-28

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.08.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 P.S.Karthikeyan Petitioner Versus 1. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore. 4. The Tahsildar Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore. 5. The Inspector of Survey Office of Tahsildar, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District. 6. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Taluk Police Station, Coimbatore District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 7. Pugalendhi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to survey the property comprised in T.S. Nos.1931 and 1933, under Schedules F, G, H, I, and J Situated at Valliyammal Layout, Pollachi Town, Coimbatore District, and to fix the metes and bounds along with adequate police protection under the supervision of the 3rd Respondent, based on the applications on the petitioner dated 31.07.2025 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mrs.Thangavadhana for Mr.S.Mareeswaran For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 to R6 Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 to 6 to provide police protection. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 and perused the documents placed on record. 3. According to the petitioner, the final decree has been passed in favour of the petitioner in O.S.No.46 of 2000 in I.A.No.1 of 2023 by the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. The Commissioner, in fact, has inspected the property and filed a plan and the civil court has also passed a decree. In pursuant to the said measurements, when the petitioner tried to fence the property, the private respondent obstructed the same, hence the petitioner submitted a representation dated 31.07.2025 seeking police protection. 4. In such view of the matter, since the decree is operating in favour of the petitioner and the subject property has also been allotted to the petitioner in pursuant to the decree of the civil court, the respondents 1 to 6 are directed to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner. With the above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 28.08.2025 Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1. The District Collector, Coimbatore District,Coimbatore. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR , J . 3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore. 4. The Tahsildar Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore. 5. The Inspector of Survey Office of Tahsildar, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District. 6. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Taluk Police Station, Coimbatore District. W.P.Crl.No.686 of 2025 28.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis