HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30332 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant Arun Yadav @ Bholu seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.451 of 2025, under Sections 333, 351(3), 109 B.N.S., Police Station- Geeda, District- Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case due. Applicant is languishing in jail since 25.7.2025. It is submitted that the applicant is in relationship with the injured. It is further submitted that false recovery of knife/tamancha is said to have been shown from the possession of the applicant during the course of investigation. It is lastly submitted that the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and submits that accused applicant is named in the FIR wherein role and involvement of applicant is clearly mentioned. The victim has specifically stated that accused applicant has caused many sharp weapon injuries on her neck. The entry of medical report is available in the case diary. From the perusal of medical report/injury report and diagnosis of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan, Saddam Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arun Yadav @ Bholu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) injuries the victim has sustained injuries over head, neck, left arm and left hand by sharp object due to assault and the victim was hospitalized in B.R.D. Medical College, Gorakhpur, U.P. 5. From the perusal of the medical report/injury report it transpires that sharp weapon injuries were caused by the applicant upon the injured. The injured has specifically stated that accused applicant has caused grievous injury upon her. Thus medical evidence also corroborates the statement of injured. 6. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and considering the submissions advanced, the nature of injury and gravity of the accusation and quantum of sentence, I find no good ground to grant bail to the applicant in the aforesaid case, at this stage. 7. The bail application is, accordingly, rejected. 8. The trial Court is directed to proceed the trial and to conclude the trial expeditiously, from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment, if there is no legal impediment. October 9, 2025 RA BAIL No. 30332 of 2025 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad