DEEPANSHU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/19587/2025 · 2025-10-08
Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19587 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the First Information Report dated 24.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 296 of 2025, under section 87 of B.N.S., Police Station Nauchandi, District Meerut. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 both are adult and got married on 24.08.2025. It is further submitted that High School Certificate of both the petitioners are collectively appended as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition and as per High School Certificate the date of birth of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are 03.03.2003 and 25.09.2004 respectively i.e. both the petitioners are adult at the time of wedding. It is also submitted that the petitioner have already registered their marriage and Marriage Registration Certificate has also been appended as Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances no case is made out against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners have also filed a joint affidavit in support of their averments made in the present petition. 3. Learned AGA appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the instant petition but have no objection regarding the fact that as per High School Certificates which is appended as Annexure No. 2 to the instant petition both the petitioners are adult and they got married with their own free will and Marriage Registration Certificate is also on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alka Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Deepanshu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Taking into consideration of the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of respective parties in respect of instant petition, we are of the opinion that the instant writ petition filed by the petitioners is liable to be allowed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the First Information Report dated 24.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 296 of 2025, under section 87 of B.N.S., Police Station Nauchandi, District Meerut is quashed.
October 9, 2025 Arti CRLP No. 19587 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad