SRI ASHWIN K KATTEMAR v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST ZONE)
WP/33567/2018 · 2025-10-31
R Nataraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91139 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91139 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43787 WP No. 33567 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 33567 OF 2018 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ASHWIN K. KATTEMAR S/O LATE C. N. NAGAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.281, 6TH MAIN, HAL III STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 075. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERESH M. UPPIN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST ZONE) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, MAYO HALL, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, C. V. RAMAN NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, 1ST A CROSS, 2ND H MAIN ROAD, KASTURINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 043.
3.
SRI. S. D. RAMAIAH S/O DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, NO.282, 6TH MAIN, HAL III STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43787 WP No. 33567 of 2018
BENGALURU - 560 075. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. H.MUJTABA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 7.6.2018 ISSUED BY R-2 VIDE ANNEX-K; FORBEAR THE R-1 AND 2 FROM DEMOLISHING THE COMPOUND WALL ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE DATED 7.6.2018 ISSUED BY R-2 AT ANNEX-K AND RESTRAIN R-1 AND 2 FROM DEMOLISHING THE COMPOUND WALL.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition does not survive in view of the decree passed in OS No.9524/2015 filed by the petitioner.
2. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57