6,<. tyf •`A lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE -.pRESENT'. THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nor. 2266 OF 2025 Between'. vanthala Rajlp @ Chandal, S/o Kayam Pradhan, aged 29 Years7 C/St Valmlkl, upper sileru, DuppulaVada, GK Veedhi Mandal, ASR District. petitioner/Accused-4 AND The State Of Andhra PradeSh, rep. by Its PubllC Prosecutor, the Hlgh Court Of Andhra PradeSh, AmaraVat'l- RespondentlComplainant petitlon under sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the Circumstances Stated 'In the affldaVIt flled ln support of the crlminal petitlon, the Hlgh Court may be Pleased tO enlarge hlm on ba" ln crime No 407/2024 for the Offence under SeCtIOnS 8 (c) r/ W 20 (b) (Il) (C) Of NDPS Act, 1985 of Bommuru Pollce Statlon, East GodaVari district, couNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER '. SRl. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA couNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT I. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV®ATI (Special Origjna[ Jurjsdictjon) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE YI LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION [3521] Between : Vanthala Rajip @ Chandal AND The State Of Andhra pradesh Counsel for the petitioner/accused: SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR sThe Court made the following: ORDER: The CrI'minal Petition has been fI-led under sectI-OnS 437 anod 439 of the code of criminal procedure,1973 (for brevity {the cr.p.c.I)/ sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatl-ya NagarI'k SurakSha sanhita, 2023 (for brevity 'the BNSS'), seeking to enlarge the petI-tI-Oner/Accused No.4 on bail in cr.No.407 of 2024 of Bommuru Police Station, East Godavari DI-Strict, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.4 herein for the offences ..-----z~ Dr. YLR, J crl.p.No.2266 of 2025 Dated 26.06.2025 punishable under section 8 (a) read With 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcot-IC Drugs and psychotropic substances Act7 1985 (for brevity [the NDPS Act7). 2. The case Of the Prosecution iS that On 12.12.2024, the Sub-Inspector of police, Bommuru Police Station] On receipt Of Credible information regarding the illegal possession and transportat'[on of ganja, secured the presence of mediatorsJ and -Inspected the Vehicles. The Sub-Inspector Of police apprehended the petitioner, other accused, and found -In their possession 205,800 KGs of Ganja 'ln eight bags in a Mahindra Marshal vehicle bearing No.APO5 AH. 7424, seized under a mediatOrS' report and arrested, them. 3. Sri Karukola Simhachalam, the learned COunSel for the Petitioner, subm-Its that the petitioner has not committed any offence; he is falsely implIICated in this Case-, he iS SOle breadwinner Of his family', he iS ready tO abide any conditions to be imposed by this court; and urged to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. Per cOnfra, Mr.Neelotphal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public prosecutor, submits that the pet'ltioner was found in possession of 205.800 KGs of Ganja, Which iS a commercial quantity. However, it iS Submitted that there are no adverse antecedents against the petitioner, charge sheet is yet to be filed and requested to pass appropriate orders. t..-, I -+ 5. Perusedtherecord. Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.2266 of2025 Dated 26.06.2O25 6. As seen from the record, the petjtjoner has been jn the judjc]'a[ custody for the past 196 days. The learned Assistant public Prosecutor fairly conceded that there are no adverse antecedents against the petitl-oner. 7. Keeping into consjderatjon the number of days the pet[|tjoner has been in judicial custody, the nature of the allegations levelled aga]-nst him, stage of the ][nvestI-gatjOn and h[-s alleged role in the case, this court is l'ncII'ned to enlarge the petitioner on bail wllth Certain stringent conditions. 8. Th,'s Court is of the opinion that ]'f certain stringent condI-lions are I-mposed on the petj{ioner for securing his presence before the learned Trial Court for trI'al, the interest of justice would be met. 9. ln the result, the crjmjnal petition is allowed with the following condjtI'OnS.I I'. The petitioner/A-4 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executI-ng a personal bond for a sum Qf Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for the like sum each {o the satisfaction of the learned vl Additional JudI'CI-al FI'rSt class MagI'Strate Court, Rajamahendravaram. I -`'--`r.s1~ crl.p.No.2266 of2025 ```ap- Dr. YLR, I Dated 26.O6.2025 ll. The PetitlOner/A-4 she" appear before the StatlOn House officer, Bommuru Pollce StatlOn, East GodaVaH DlstriCt, On every saturday ln between 10.00 am and 05 00 pm, tlll the conclusion of the Trial. Ill The PetitlOner/A-4 sha" not leave the limltS Of the DistHct without prior permission from the leamed Trial Judge. lv The PetltlOner/A-4 shall not COmmit Or indulge in SImllar offences in future. v The PetltlOner/A-4 she" cooperate With the lnVeSttgatlng off'lcer 'ln further investigation of the case Tot and shall be avallable to the lnvestlgatlng offlcer as and when called by him. IITRUE COPY" AS SS:DsEiT::¥:oNTNA#iMcT:REAR Ra\amahendTaVaTam The V\ ^dd\\\O+a^\aln#\=:S=T=OanS: *`*ET : hh= \\=T\\\\=ti\n=\::ntdG=C#`:Sp# tee n =\aa\\ao Tnt_mTEnapS\u cG\o I u:^=`::ne\`bc=c*,:sp*ua\ apmo=e n ={\aa\ao\n`: ` `EnapS\u GG\o a a Va " NIag \S\Ta\e1 1 2. \nt3--T 4 \*\i±:=\\\+OO^nps\=B:u*:n#\=hU cKoOuLit^o:\VpO\Coa%\\O P a G\ : L\=-=Ta\\on House On\uG\,i - (, 5l =%_=e+\=±\Cntsa\\Ooe pcS\RptvL== NIT =%=EHGhuLT^ONIR#\=hu =Ovu-rf O€ A PLO u` c\\s\T\C\1 6. One Spare COPYI_ -r HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED..26/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2266 of 2025 ALLOWED .. `,-tt,,.`._-..-`.. I E ®