ANIL KUMAR CHAUCHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/23755/2025 · 2025-08-19
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91105 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91105 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.123 Anil Kumar Chauhan State of Haryana and
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE M
Present : Dr. Naresh Kaushik
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J (1)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that today the petitioner satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Deputy Commissioner Panchayat, village Patla, Tehsil and District Sonepat representation Annexure P (2) Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. (3) Accordingly, above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direc take a decision on the aforesaid representation moved by a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned preferably within two months (4) Till the final decision petitioner’s representation question shall be maintained.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anil Kumar Chauhan
Versus and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall withdraw the civil suit filed by present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Deputy Commissioner-cum-Collector, Sonepat and respondent No. Panchayat, village Patla, Tehsil and District Sonepat representation Annexure P-12, moved by the petitioner Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, subject to the petitioner withdrawing his civil suit, as the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to on the aforesaid representation moved by speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned preferably within two months, in accordance with law. ill the final decision to be taken by respondents No. representation, status quo with regard to possession of the land in question shall be maintained.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-23755-2025 Date of decision : 19.08.2025
.…. Petitioner
..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that within one week from shall withdraw the civil suit filed by him and that he would be present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent tor, Sonepat and respondent No.6-Gram Panchayat, village Patla, Tehsil and District Sonepat to take a decision on the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no subject to the petitioner withdrawing his civil suit, as tion to respondents No.3 and 6 to on the aforesaid representation moved by the petitioner, by passing speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, , in accordance with law. to be taken by respondents No.3 and 6 on the with regard to possession of the land in SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.08.22 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh
CWP-23755-2025
(5) Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
19.08.2025 shamsher
[ 2 ]
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to ioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the ioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
[DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.08.22 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh