SMT TANU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/30209/2025 · 2025-09-22
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91097 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91097 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30209 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. As per the instructions so received by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, it is submitted that petitioner no.1 has already married with some other person and seeking protection being a married couple of petitioner no.2 which is contrary to the facts as narrated by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
4. No protection can be acceded on the grounds of false averments made in the petition.
5. Instant petition is accordingly dismissed. September 23, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, Shashwat Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt Tanu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad