Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9109 (JHR)

RAJESH KESHARI ALIAS RAJESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2486/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17437] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2486 of 2025 ------ Rajesh Keshari @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 25 years, Son of Indradev Saw, Resident of Village Kobna, P.O.- Kobna & P.S.- Hunterganj, District- Chatra, State- Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-01-07-2025 I.A. No.7285 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2486 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.121 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 147, 149, 341, 448, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, attempted to murder the informant and committed theft of Rs.2,200/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that both the petitioner and the informant are agnates and there is a land dispute prevailing between them. It is then submitted that prior to this case, from the side of the petitioner, Hunterganj P.S. Case No.120 of 2024 has been instituted and as a counter-blast, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.02.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary affidavit. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Chatra in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No.121 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/