SRI D PADMANABHA KUMAR v. THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL
WP/7058/2022 · 2025-11-17
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91087 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91087 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46979 WP No. 7058 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.7058 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI.D.PADMANABHA KUMAR ADVOCATE AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) S/O LATE NARAYANA RED BUILDING NEAR KARNATAKA BANK GARODI MANGALORE-575002
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL OLD ELECTION COMMISSION OFFICE DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001.
REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN
2.
D. DIVAKAR ACHAR R.G., S/O BHUJANA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
3. MRS.SHAKUNTHALA W/O D.DIVAKAR ACHAR R.G., AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46979 WP No. 7058 of 2022
BOTH THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 R/AT DOOR NO.3-74, SRI.GURUKRUPA KATEEL ROAD NEAR ST.JOSEPH COLLEGE BAJPE, MANGALORE D.K-574142
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.H.J.ANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2 AND R.3;
R.1 - SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING IMPUGNED RESOLUTION PASSED IN MEETING HELD ON 12TH AND 13TH OF MARCH, 2022 PERTAINING TO THE ITEM NO.9 I.E. AS PER ANNEXURE-A CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPLAINT THEREBY PASSING RESOLUTION AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioner is assailing the resolution dated 12th and 13th of March, 2022 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.1.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46979 WP No. 7058 of 2022
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the consequential order pursuant to the Annexure-A is challenged in W.P.No.15857/2023, which is pending before this Court.
4. In that view of the matter, without going into the merits of the case and leaving open the issue to be considered in the above writ petition, the present writ petition needs to be disposed of as having become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35