Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91083 (ALL)

SMT RANJANA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

NA528/33516/2025 · 2025-09-17

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33516 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Ugrasen Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the present application has been preferred seeking a direction to the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 to ensure compliance of the order dated 19.10.2024, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria in Complaint Case No. 4229 of 2023, passing an order in favour of the applicant that during the pendency of the proceedings, the applicant shall not be dispossessed from the house where she is living and her electricity, water and other essential services may not be discontinued but the electricity has been discontinued. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that liberty be accorded to the applicant to take legal remedies as per the provisions contained under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. 3. Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same. 4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to take appropriate remedies as permissible and available under law and this Court has no reasons to disbelieve that the same shall be decided strictly in accordance with law, of course, subject to any legal impediment. September 18, 2025 Vijay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ragini Pandey, Ugrasen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Smt Ranjana Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad