PREM PARKASH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8748/2025 · 2025-08-13
Yashvir Singh Rathor
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91056 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91056 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-8748-2025 1 130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8748-2025 Date of Decision: 13.08.2025
PREM PARKASH AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab. **** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
, J. (Oral)
1. Having married against the wishes of their family members, petitioners are now apprehending threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 12 and have prayed for granting them protection by way of this petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage on 11.07.2025. Copy of marriage certificate is (Annexure P-3). Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 11.08.2025 was also made to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar to look into their Asgar Ali 2025.08.13 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8748-2025 2 representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents.
4. Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.
5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) JUDGE 13.08.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Asgar Ali 2025.08.13 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document