HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30843 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. It is argued by the Sri Rajesh Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that that there are certain short comings in the present petition, hence a prayer has been made to dismiss the present petition with liberty to file a fresh. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed. (Prakash Padia,J.) September 17, 2025 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana Sukhram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad