MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/46937/2025 · 2025-08-27
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91039 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 91039 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-46937-2025 1 121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46937-2025 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Charanpal Singh Bagri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA
, J (Oral):
1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for the issuance of a writ, order or direction to official respondents to take an appropriate legal action on the representation dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner before the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Khanna, District Ludhiana, against the respondent No.6 and others for offence of cheating, criminal conspiracy, forgery, and fraud committed in relation to the forged agreement to sell dated 14.12.2015 and fake entries in the stamp vendor register.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners had moved a representation in the month of February i.e. 5 months ago but no action has been taken on their representation thereupon so far.
3. On advance notice, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab, and submitted that on representation of the petitioners, the competent authority will take action as per law.
4. Heard.
5. Keeping in view the contentions of learned counsel for the MONIKA RANI 2025.09.03 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-46937-2025 2 parties, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-1) within one month and pass appropriate orders, as per law. Petitioners are at liberty to avail their legal remedy, if they still feel aggrieved.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 27.08.2025 monika
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No
2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.09.03 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document