Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91030 (ALL)

GEETA SINGH v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/20222/2025 · 2025-09-16

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20222 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned A.G.A for State-respondents. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 18.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0365 of 2025, under sections- 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., and, Police Station- Gorakhnath, District - Gorakhpur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. Learned counsel for the parties agreed that the petitioner is not the beneficiary of any amount which has been received by the co-accused in their account. She alleges false implication in this case only because of being mother-in-law of co-accused, Vikash Sinha. Investigating officer of the police is still investigating the matter. After hearing the rival contentions, totality of facts and circumstances of this case and in view of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ petition No. 7463/2024 (Shobhit Nehra Vs. State of U.P.), the above noted writ petition is disposed of directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of this case within period of 60 days. During the period of investigation and till cognizance is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested. In case of non-cooperation with the police investigation by the petitioner/petitioners, it shall be open for either of the respondents to file recall application of this order. September 17, 2025 Abhishek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Puja Chauhan, Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vineet Kumar Singh (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Geeta Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad