HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30627 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 to deduct the amount sum of Rs.10,000/- (illegal transfer) has come into my account and return it and activate my account. ii. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. iii. Award cost of this writ petition to the petitioner." 3. This Court in identical matter i.e. Writ-C No.1542 of 2025 has passed an order on 08.04.2025, which is reproduced herein-below:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri O.P. Gupta, learned counsel for the Union of India and Sri Amrish Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent Bank. Petitioner is aggrieved by action of the respondent bank in freezing his bank account. Learned counsel for the respondent bank has placed before the Court a notice issued to the Bank under Section 91 Cr.P.C. by the Government of Telangana, as per which unauthorized transactions have been undertaken Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwanshu Tiwari, Shailesh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vikash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) from the petitioner's bank account, which is reported by the criminal investigation wing. A criminal investigation has also been instituted under Section 420 IPC and other provisions of IPC. Details of such communication has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. Once the involvement of petitioner's bank account has surfaced in the criminal proceedings, remedy of the petitioner would be to approach the competent forum for release of his bank account. A writ petition would not lie for such purposes, at the first instance. Writ petition, accordingly, is consigned to records." 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the order dated 08.04.2025 passed in Writ-C No.1542 of 2025. September 25, 2025 Sattyarth WRIC No. 30627 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad