Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91003 (KAR)

MUDDU KRISHNA H R @ MITHUN RAI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/523/2023 · 2025-11-17

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46986 CRL.RP No. 523 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 523 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MUDDU KRISHNA H R @ MITHUN RAI S/O RAJU H E @ PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/A HEGGOVE VILLAGE, BELGODU HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 01. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRATHEEP K C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAKALESHPURA SUB DIVISION SAKALESHPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT-01, REP SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 01. 2. POLICE INSPECTOR SAKALESHPURA RURAL POLICE STATION SAKALESHPURA, REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGAURU - 01 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PRAKARANA SAM/MAG/464/2022-23 DATED 27.03.2023 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHPURA SUB DIVISION BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE CRL.RP THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46986 CRL.RP No. 523 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 27.03.2023 bearing no.JA.J.f 464/2022-23 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Sakaleshpura Sub-Division, Sakaleshpura, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Pratheep K.C., learned counsel for petitioner submitted that period of externment under impugned order was for two months i.e., from 27.03.2023 to 27.05.2023, which has been expired during pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, impugned order is spent. 3. Smt.N. Anitha Girish, learned HCGP for respondents does not dispute submission. 4. In view of above, revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49