Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9100 (JHR)

BOGADI YADAV ALIAS GANESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3079/2025 · 2025-04-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:11711 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3079 of 2025 ------ Bogadi Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav, aged about 60 years, son of Mahohar Yadav @ Manohar Yadav, Resident of village – Postiya, P.O. and P.S. –Bashisthnagar, District –Chatra. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bashisthnagar P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons caused miscarriage of the child of the informant, outraged her modesty and criminally intimidated the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is then submitted that the main allegation is against Vikash Yadav. It is then submitted that the petitioner is an old person aged 60 years. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.01.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 07.04.2025, in A.B.A. No. 2242 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra, in connection with Bashisthnagar P.S. Case No.94 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/