Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9100 (AP)

Sri. K. Prakash, v. Honble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court,

WP/4449/2018 · 2025-08-11

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010100172018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4449/2018 Between: 1. SRI. K. PRAKASH,, S/O. K.J. SIKHAMANI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. EX-EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.9-4-25, L.M. COMPOUND, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HONBLE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUMLABOUR COURT, THE HONBLE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - CUM - LABOUR COURT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., ALLAGADDA BUS DEPOT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) 2. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA 3. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.4449 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue Writ order or direction or writ more particular one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and after calling for the records award in I.D.No.5/2014 dt. 09.04.2015 on the file of the Hon’ble 1st respondent in not grating any relief to the petitioner is iIlegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently quash the award in I.D.No.5/2014 dt.09.04.2015 by granting reinstatement with continuity of service, attendant benefits and back wages to the petitioner and pass…” 2. None appeared for the writ petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents/APSRTC is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.08.2025. SR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 4449 OF 2018 Date: 12.08.2025 SR