Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 91 (MAN)

Manoharmayum Nandakishor Sharma and 4 ors v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 4 ORS

MC(WP(C))/697/2024 · 2026-01-29

Ahanthem Bimol Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd…/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Angom James Singh … Petitioner Vs. T. Ranjan Singh … Respondent B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 30-01-2026 Heard Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Y. Neha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Alina, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent that the direction given by this court has been duly complied with by the respondents by issuing a Memorandum dated 20-11-2025 and as such, the present contempt can be closed. Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a rider may be made that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said compliance order, he is at liberty to challenge the same by filing appropriate petition before the appropriate forum as provided by law. In view of the submission made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties and after perusal of the compliance report IN. 27 SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.01.30 14:26:50 +05'30' Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd…/- dated 24-11-2025 submitted by the respondents, this court is satisfied that the direction given by this court on 14-05-2024 in CRP(CRP Art. 227) No. 2 of 2024 has been duly complied with by the respondents. Accordingly, the present contempt case is hereby closed. Needless to say that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said compliance order, he is at liberty to challenge the same by filing appropriate petition before the appropriate forum as provided under the law. JUDGE Devananda -2- Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd…/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227)) No. 94 of 2025 (Ref:- CRP(CRP Art. 227) No. 2 of 2024) Manoharmayum Nandakishor Sharma & ors. … Applicants Vs. Takhellambam Thomas Singh & anr. … Respondents With MC(WP(C)) No. 697 of 2024 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 30-01-2026 In view of the order passed today in the connected contempt case, the present applications stand closed. JUDGE Devananda IN. 28 & 29 SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.01.30 14:27:10 +05'30' Cont. Case (C) J2 No. 2 of 2025 Contd…/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 789 of 2024 Manoharmayum Nandakishor Sharma … Petitioner Vs. State of Manipur & ors. … Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 30-01-2026 Mr. S. Biswajit, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. W. Sanatomba, learned counsel appeared for the petitioner; Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appeared for the respondents No. 1 to 4 and Mr. I. Sandeep, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent No. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5 submitted that the petitioner has filed an additional affidavit only yesterday and as such, the learned counsel seeks three weeks’ time to file a reply thereto. Prayer is allowed. It has been submitted at the bar that the present writ petition does not pertains to service matter. In view of the submission made above, registry is directed to list this case before the appropriate roster bench on 18-03-2026. JUDGE Devananda IN. 30 SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Digitally signed by SHOUGRAKPAM DEVANANDA SINGH Date: 2026.01.30 14:27:27 +05'30'