Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90993 (PNJ)

SAJANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/46088/2025 · 2025-09-19

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ARCHANA ARORA 2025.09.24 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46088-2025 (O&M) 2 learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 03.09.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 146 dated 28.06.2024 under Sections 325, 279, 337, 338, 323, 294, 506, 427, 148, 149, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station City Jagraon, District Ludhiana (Rural), Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/settlement dated 04.08.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 19.09.2025 JUDGE archana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ARCHANA ARORA 2025.09.24 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document