- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 31085 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: RAJU RAKSHITH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/AT NO.8, ISHWARA NILAYA, CHANNASANDRA, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR POST, BENGALURU -560 098. PAN:BTEPR9134E …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.S.BALACHANDRAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(2)(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. 2. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BENGALURU-2, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT. ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT AS THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT MAY DEEM FIT Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 AND QUASH THE FOLLOWING ANNEXURE -A IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 29.03.2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT FOR AY 2019-20 IN DIN AND NOTICE NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1051604183(1) ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 1. In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "Wherefore it is prayed most humbly prayed to this Hon'ble High Court to:-: i. issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ as the Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and quash the following: ANNEXURE 'A' Impugned notice dated 29.03.2023 issued by Respondent No.1 under section 148A(b) of the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022- 23/1051604183 (1) ANNEXURE 'A2' Impugned notice dated 06.04.2023 issued by Respondent No.1 under section 148A(b) of the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022- 23/1051898097 (1) ANNEXURE 'B' Impugned order dated 11.04.2023 passed by Respondent No.1 under section 148A(d) of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2023-24/1052013371 (1) ANNEXURE 'C' Impugned notice dated 11.04.2023 issued by Respondent No.1 under section 148 of the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2023-24/1052013639 (1) ANNEXURE 'D' Impugned ex-parte assessment order dated 25.02.2025 passed by Respondent No.2 under section 147 read with section 144 read with section 144B of the Act for AY 2019- 2020 in DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/F/147/2024-25/1073711013 (1) ANNEXURE 'D1' Impugned computation sheet dated 25.02.2025 issued by Respondent No.2 under section 147 read with section 144 of the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Document No. ITBA/AST/S/319/2024-25/1073715924(1) ANNEXURE 'D2' Impugned demand notice dated 25.02.2025 issued by Respondent No.2 under section 156 of the Act for AY 2019-2020 in DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/156/2024- 25/1073716027(1) ii. issue any other writ, order or direction to which the petitioner is found entitled to in the present facts and circumstances." 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the order of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025, in order to contend that the present petition deserves to be allowed and disposed of in terms of the said order. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition is directly and squarely covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025, the operative portion of which reads as under: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 "13. I, therefore, pass the following: O R D E R (i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151-A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in these cases would stand quashed. (ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive all these petitions in the event the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the pending before it. (iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petitions are allowed. (iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of these petitions would become necessary." 6. The aforesaid order is applicable to the facts and circumstances of the instant case and consequently, the present petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Ramachandra Reddy's case (supra). 7. In the result, I pass the following: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40871 WP No. 31085 of 2025 ORDER (i) The petition is allowed and disposed of in terms of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025. (ii) The impugned show cause notices and consequential orders, notices etc., at Annexures-A1, A2, B, C,D,D1 and D2 dated 29.03.2023, 06.04.2023, 11.04.2023, 11.04.2023, 25.02.2025, 25.02.2025, 25.02.2025, respectively are hereby quashed. (iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents - Revenue to seek revival of this petition, subsequent to disposal of the matters pending before the Apex Court and all rival contentions between the parties in this regard are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14