HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30689 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The order of termination of employee of the petitioner passed by the respondent No.3/Tata Capital Financial Company Limited Mumbai and respondent No.4/Tata Capital Financial Company Limited Gorakhpur is under challenge. 2. Today when the matter is taken up, preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the order which is under challenge has been passed by the private entity and the writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against the private persons and if the petitioner is aggrieved with the act of private individuals, he has common law remedy for redressal of his grievances. 3. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed with liberty o the petitioner to avail common law remedy, if so advice. September 11, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jaishankar Prasad Tyagi, Lallan Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Jairaj .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad