Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90982 (ALL)

RSPL LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/30363/2025 · 2025-09-09

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30363 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Jahnavi Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Sri Manas Bhargava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayers:- "I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to expeditiously decide the petitioner's claim/objection dated 07.07.2025 together with earlier applications/representations dated 14.02.2020, 21.05.2024, 25.07.2024, 20.09.2024 and 20.05.2025 filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a time bound manner and to refund the subsidy amount of Rs. 1,02,230/- alongwith interest at the prevailing market rate wrongfully recovered from the petitioner's establishment, which was validly granted under the Atmanirbhar Bharat Rojgar Yojana (ABRY) in spite of being a separately registered and complaint establishment under the EPFO Scheme." 3. It is argued that considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by Sri Manas Bhargava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of contesting respondents that in case, the petitioner will submit a representation before the concerned respondent authorities, he will pass appropriate orders in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jahnavi Singh, Ravindra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Jagdish Pathak, Manas Bhargava, Saurabh Kumar Tripathi Rspl Limited .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) disposed of directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation annexing the copies of the earlier representations before the concerned competent authority and a certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. In case, the representation is filed within the stipulated period, the concerned competent authority will pass appropriate orders most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation. September 10, 2025 Arti WRIC No. 30363 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad