- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54256 CRP No. 559 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 559 OF 2024 (SC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUCHITRA W/O LATE UDAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT MANJUNATHA JEWELLERS NO. 40/2, 40/5, 40/6, 6TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU - 560 003. 2. MISS. MALAVIKA D/O LATE UDAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT MANJUNATHA JEWELLERS NO. 40/2, 40/5, 40/6, 6TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU - 560 003. 3. SRI. MAYUR S/O LATE UDAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDING AT MANJUNATHA JEWELLERS NO. 40/2, 40/5, 40/6, 6TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU - 560 003. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RANGANATH R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54256 CRP No. 559 of 2024 AND: 1. SMT. PUSHPALATHA W/O LATE G N RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. SRI. G.R. PRAJWAL S/O LATE G.N. RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. MR. G.N. MAYURAKSHI S/O LATE DR NINGOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 4. SRI. G.N. MOHAN S/O LATE DR. NINGOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS ALL THE RESPONDENTS RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS, PARK EXTENSION, DURGIGUDI EXTENSION SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO R4) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT 1964, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.04.2024 PASSED IN SC.NO.15187/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV ACMM COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE (SCCH-20). PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EVECTION - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54256 CRP No. 559 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the revision petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents is present and files a memo with copy of the order passed by this Court in CRP No.558/2024 connected with CRP No.560/2024 dated 26.11.2025. 3. He would request that similar order be passed in the present case. 4. Taking note of the fact that facts involved in the present revision petition and facts involved in CRP No.558/2024 connected with CRP No.560/2024 are practically one and the same and also taking note of the fact that revision petitioners are consistently absent before - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54256 CRP No. 559 of 2024 the Court perhaps not to suffer similar orders that of CRP No.558/2024 connected with CRP No.560/2024. 5. As such, left with no alternative, present revision petition also stands disposed of in terms of the order passed in CRP No.558/2024 connected with CRP No.560/2024 dated 26.11.2025. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29