Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9096 (GAU)

NIPEN SARKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/580/2025 · 2025-04-08

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010052822025 2025:GAU-AS:4438 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/580/2025 NIPEN SARKAR S/O. MAHENDRA SARKAR,R/O.AMARA PATHAR,SONAPUR,GUWAHATI,P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR,DIST- KAMRUP METRO,ASSAM,PIN-782402 2: NIRANJAN MANDAL S/O. UPENDRA MANDAL R/O.AMARA PATHAR SONAPUR GUWAHATI P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN-782402 3: BISHNU SAHA S/O. LATE SANKAR SAHA R/O.AMARA PATHAR SONAPUR GUWAHATI P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN-782402 4: GANESH MANDAL S/O. LATE SANKAR MANDAL R/O.AMARA PATHAR SONAPUR GUWAHATI P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN-782402 Page No.# 2/4 5: RANJAN BARMAN S/O. LATE RATI RANJAN BARMAN R/O.AMARA PATHAR SONAPUR GUWAHATI P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN-782402 6: MANINDRA MANDAL S/O. SATTI MANDAL R/O.AMARA PATHAR SONAPUR GUWAHATI P.O AND P.S-SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN-78240 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A HUSSAIN, MS JUTISMITA DAS,MS PURABI DEKA,MR. T N DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 09.04.2025 1. Heard learned Counsel Ms. J.Das for the petitioners 1. Nipen Sarkar, 2. Niranjan Mandal, 3. Bishnu Saha, 4. Ganesh Mandal, 5. Ranjan Barman and 6. Manindra Mandal who have filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 with a prayer for pre-arrest bail apprehending arrest in connection Page No.# 3/4 with Sonapur PS Case No. 217/2024, Under Section 191 (2)/191(3)/121(2)/132/117(2)/118(2)/324(4)/325(5)/61(2) of the BNS. 2. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor Mr. R.J.Baruah is present for the State respondent. 3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they were involved in attacking police when the police tried to prevent illegal gambling and tried to take away the dice from the place of occurrence. 4. Learned Addl.Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection in granting bail to the petitioners. 5. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. 6. Investigation has substantially progressed. 7. I have considered the submissions that the petitioners are willing to co- operate with the investigation. 8. It appears that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as they are willing to abide by any stringent condition if imposed upon them. 9. In the event of arrest of petitioners named above, they shall be released on pre-arrest bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- each with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority subject to the following conditions: i) The petitioners shall appear before the I.O. within one week from today and shall co-operate with the investigation, ii) The petitioners shall refrain from such activities with Page No.# 4/4 which they are alleged , iii) The petitioners shall appear before the I.O. every fortnight till completion of investigation. 8. On breach of any of the above conditions, pre-arrest bail order shall automatically stand cancelled. 9. The pre-arrest bail application stands disposed of. 10. Send back the Case Dairy. JUDGE Comparing Assistant