HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34981 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS, has been filed for quashing the charge sheet no. 240/2023 dated 22.09.2023 and cognizance order dated 16.12.2023 and Bailable Warrant order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned trial court in Case no. 2535/2025 under Section 60 of U.P.Excise Duty Act, PS- Jalalpur, District Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that impugned order is against the facts and law. The applicant had no knowledge about the proceedings initiated against him due to which he could not appear on the date fixed by the trial Court, hence, bailable warrant was issued against the applicant. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A opposed the prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned Bailable Warrant order dated 25.06.2025 within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. However, it is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nilesh Kumar Bharti .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of orders impugned along with entire proceeding. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. September 12, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 34981 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad