APHC010099582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6115/2020 Between: 1. G. JOGESWARA REDDY,, S/O. C. MUNI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALIGIVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, RAMAGIRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM URBAN POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. MAMILLA LAKSHMAIAH, , S/O. LATE BALAPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 9-288, GANDHI NAGAR, CHOWDESHWARI COLONY, DHARMAVARAM TOWN, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of 3rd respondent interfering into civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent and by directing the petitioner to pay amounts to the 4th respondent as per agreement dated 14.06.2017 without having any jurisdiction is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and 4th Respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to insist the petitioner to pay amounts to the 4th respondent as per agreement dated 14.06.2017 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6115 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of 3rd respondent interfering into civil disputes between the petitioner and 4th respondent and by directing the petitioner to pay amounts to the 4th respondent as per agreement dated 14.06.2017 without having any jurisdiction is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and 4th Respondent and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Kata Samba Siva Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that challenging the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, the present writ petition is filed. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the respondent-police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS