Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 90890 (KAR)

M/S. S.R. TRADING CO., v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/16156/2024 · 2025-10-15

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41139 WP No. 16156 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 16156 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. S.R. TRADING CO., NO. 283, RAJEEV GANDHI ROAD KUVEMPUNAGAR JALAHALLI EAST BENGALURU 560 041 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR P.W. RAGHAVAN. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISHKUMAR E.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AUDIT 6.3, DVO-06 BENGALURU - 560 058. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT ON 13.03.2024 IN FILE NO.DCCT (A)- 6.3/DGSTO-6/2023-24 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41139 WP No. 16156 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER On 08.09.2025, the following order was passed: "One week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution". 2. Despite the said order, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections and consequently, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek recalling / revival of the present petition, if the occasion so arises. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl.