Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2990/2025 Idrish S/o Dalli, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Bela, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvinder Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Ms. Minakshi Pareek, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.397/2024 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 333 & 3(5) of BNS. Later on, police filed charge- sheet for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) & 118(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross cases have been registered between the parties. It is submitted that both sides have sustained injuries. None of the injuries sustained to injured is dangerous to life. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2025. Further custody of
[2025:RJ-JP:9570] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2990/2025] the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. They submit that three other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in all three cases, petitioner has been acquitted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; nature of injuries as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Idrish S/o Dalli, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall mark his presence once in every three months in the concerned police
[2025:RJ-JP:9570] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2990/2025] station. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10.
If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /415