- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:56279 CRL.A No. 1781 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1781 OF 2023 (A-) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. S. SOUNDAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. SRI. SURYA PRAKASH, R/AT NO. 3/2, 2ND CROSS, NEAR RAMAKRISHNA MIDDLE SCHOOL, LINGAIAHNAPALYA, HALASURU, BANGALORE-560 008. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G V BABU.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. DOLPHIN TEXTILES OFFICE AT NO. 84, RAJAJI ROAD, WEST TAMBARAM, CHENNAI-600 045, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, SRI. S. PERUMAL AND SMT. P. SHANTHI. 2. SRI. S. PERUMAL S/O. SRI. SUBRAMANI CHETTIAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PARTNER, M/S. DOLPHIN SILKS. 3. SMT. P. SHANTHI W/O. SRI. S. PERUMAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PARTNER, M/S. DOLPHIN TEXTILES. Digitally signed by DHAKSHAYINI R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:56279 CRL.A No. 1781 of 2023 BOTH ARE R/AT. NO.17/3, GANDHI ROAD, WEST TAMBARAM, CHENNAI - 600045. …RESPONDENTS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2023 PASSED IN C.C.NO.54860/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE CASE IN C.C.NO.54860/2021 FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant/ complainant being aggrieved by the dismissal of complaint vide order dated 22.08.2023 passed in C.C No.54860/2021 by the XXXIV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bengaluru (for short "the trial Court"). 2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CELESTIUM FINANCIAL v. A GNANASEKARAN ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:56279 CRL.A No. 1781 of 2023 reported in 2025 SCC ONLINE SC 1320, at paragraph 10 of the judgment, has observed as under: "10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. was inserted in the statute book only with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of Cr. P.C., irrespective of whether he is a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of Section 378 of Cr. P.C." 3. In the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's recent clarification of the legal position, it is now evident that the appellant, being the complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is also entitled to file an appeal before the Sessions Court. If this Court were to proceed to hear and decide the appeal at this - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:56279 CRL.A No. 1781 of 2023 stage, it could deprive the parties of an available forum, i.e. this Court, for further challenge. 4. Considering the above, it is deemed fit that the present appeal be transferred to the concerned appellate Court of Sessions. Accordingly, I pass the following: O R D E R i. Registry is directed to transfer the entire record of the case to the concerned Principal District & Sessions Judge, who may assign it to the concerned Appellate Court having the jurisdiction and for which purpose, it would be listed before the Principal District & Sessions Judge; ii. The concerned transferee court is directed to issue Court notice to both the parties to appear before the concerned Court, and the concerned Court, thereafter, shall proceed with the case in accordance with law; iii. In case there are applications pending for condonation of delay or any other pending applications, the same also be transferred - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:56279 CRL.A No. 1781 of 2023 to be considered by the learned Judge of transferee Court, in accordance with law; iv. Considering the matter has been pending for considerable time, the Appellate Court is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible; v. The appellant is permitted to carry out necessary amendment in the cause-title and also the provisions thereof; vi. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations as to the merits of the case and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the Court concerned. 5. In the light of the above observation and directions, appeal stands disposed of. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE KBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 51